This book offers its readers a unique comprehensive survey of the various theoretical contributions which have been made to the study of argumentation.

In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions.

In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules.

This volume identifies and analyses English words and expressions that are crucial for an adequate reconstruction of argumentative discourse.

No detailed description available for "Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions".

The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory.

No detailed description available for "Handbook of Argumentation Theory".

In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings together the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by introducing the concept of strategic maneuvering.

This volume presents 50 contributions on the themes of reasonableness and effectiveness and their connections, which are central issues in argumentation theory.

This volume gives a theoretical account of the problem of analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse.